cg
diff grant.html @ 5:21ae2b01cc60
added figures
author | bshanks@bshanks-salk.dyndns.org |
---|---|
date | Sat Apr 11 19:50:21 2009 -0700 (16 years ago) |
parents | 29eee29f9bc1 |
children | 3c874c1cd837 |
line diff
1.1 --- a/grant.html Sat Apr 11 19:12:32 2009 -0700
1.2 +++ b/grant.html Sat Apr 11 19:50:21 2009 -0700
1.3 @@ -108,12 +108,12 @@
1.4 to label more than a few genes. Therefore, we must select only a few genes as
1.5 features.
1.6 Principle 3: Use geometry in feature selection
1.7 - When doing feature selection with score-based methods, the simplest thing to
1.8 - do would be to score the performance of each voxel by itself and then combine
1.9 - these scores; this is pointwise scoring. A more powerful approach is to also use
1.10 - information about the geometric relations between each voxel and its neighbors;
1.11 - this requires non-pointwise, local scoring methods. See Preliminary Results for
1.12 - evidence of the complementary nature of pointwise and local scoring methods.
1.13 + When doing feature selection with score-based methods, the simplest thing to do
1.14 + would be to score the performance of each voxel by itself and then combine these
1.15 + scores (pointwise scoring). A more powerful approach is to also use information
1.16 + about the geometric relations between each voxel and its neighbors; this requires
1.17 + non-pointwise, local scoring methods. See Preliminary Results for evidence of
1.18 + the complementary nature of pointwise and local scoring methods.
1.19 Principle 4: Work in 2-D whenever possible
1.20 There are many anatomical structures which are commonly characterized in
1.21 terms of a two-dimensional manifold. When it is known that the structure that
1.22 @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@
1.23 the analysis algorithm to take advantage of this prior knowledge. In addition,
1.24 it is easier for humans to visualize and work with 2-D data.
1.25 Therefore, when possible, the instances should represent pixels, not voxels.
1.26 + Aim 2
1.27 + todo
1.28 3
1.29
1.30 Aim 3
1.31 @@ -173,6 +175,7 @@
1.32 conceivable that the methods we propose to develop could be used to suggest
1.33 modifications to the human cortical map as well.
1.34 Related work
1.35 + todo
1.36 Preliminary work
1.37 Justification of principles 1 thur 3
1.38 Principle 1: Combinatorial gene expression
1.39 @@ -198,8 +201,6 @@
1.40 useful.
1.41 The requirement to find combinations of only a small number of genes limits
1.42 us from straightforwardly applying many of the most simple techniques from
1.43 - the field of supervised machine learning. In the parlance of machine learning,
1.44 - our task combines feature selection with supervised learning.
1.45 __________________________
1.46 1“WW, C2 and coiled-coil domain containing 1”; EntrezGene ID 211652
1.47 2“mitochondrial translational initiation factor 2”; EntrezGene ID 76784
1.48 @@ -228,6 +229,8 @@
1.49 genes which (individually) best match area AUD, according to gradient similar-
1.50 ity. From left to right and top to bottom, the genes are Ssr1, Efcbp1, Aph1a,
1.51 Ptk7, Aph1a again, and Lepr
1.52 + the field of supervised machine learning. In the parlance of machine learning,
1.53 + our task combines feature selection with supervised learning.
1.54 Principle 3: Use geometry
1.55 To show that local geometry can provide useful information that cannot be
1.56 detected via pointwise analyses, consider Fig. . The top row of Fig. displays