cg
diff grant.html @ 67:20e4b29ddc99
.
author | bshanks@bshanks.dyndns.org |
---|---|
date | Mon Apr 20 14:33:20 2009 -0700 (16 years ago) |
parents | f14c34563ff8 |
children | 60d7c1c1b94f |
line diff
1.1 --- a/grant.html Mon Apr 20 13:08:18 2009 -0700
1.2 +++ b/grant.html Mon Apr 20 14:33:20 2009 -0700
1.3 @@ -333,9 +333,9 @@
1.4 the cortex, creating a two-dimensional mesh.
1.5 We sampled the nodes of the irregular, flat mesh in order to create a regular grid of pixel values. We converted this grid
1.6 into a MATLAB matrix.
1.7 -We manually traced the boundaries of each cortical area from the ABA coronal reference atlas slides. We then converted
1.8 -these manual traces into Caret-format regional boundary data on the mesh surface. We projected the regions onto the 2-d
1.9 -mesh, and then onto the grid, and then we converted the region data into MATLAB format.
1.10 +We manually traced the boundaries of each of 49 cortical areas from the ABA coronal reference atlas slides. We then
1.11 +converted these manual traces into Caret-format regional boundary data on the mesh surface. We projected the regions
1.12 +onto the 2-d mesh, and then onto the grid, and then we converted the region data into MATLAB format.
1.13 At this point, the data is in the form of a number of 2-D matrices, all in registration, with the matrix entries representing
1.14 a grid of points (pixels) over the cortical surface:
1.15 ∙A 2-D matrix whose entries represent the regional label associated with each surface pixel
1.16 @@ -469,22 +469,31 @@
1.17 does not express very much on the medial surface. By adding together the values at each pixel in these two figures, we get
1.18 the lower-left image. This combination captures area MO much better than any single gene.
1.19
1.20 +
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24 -
1.25 - Figure 6: todo liso
1.26 +
1.27 +Figure 6: Top row: 19 of the major subdivisions of the cortex. Second row: the first 6 reduced dimensions, using PCA.
1.28 +Third row: the first 6 reduced dimensions, using NNMF. Fourth row: the first six reduced dimensions, using landmark
1.29 +Isomap. Bottom row: examples of kmeans clustering applied to reduced datasets to find 7 clusters. Left: PCA. Middle:
1.30 +NNMF. Right: Landmark Isomap. Additional details: In the third and fourth rows, 7 dimensions were found, but only 6
1.31 +displayed. In the last row: for PCA, 50 dimensions were used; for NNMF, 6 dimensions were used; for landmark Isomap, 7
1.32 +dimensions were used.
1.33 surface pixels based on their gene expression profiles. We achieved classification accuracy of about 81%19. As noted above,
1.34 however, a classifier that looks at all the genes at once isn’t as practically useful as a classifier that uses only a few genes.
1.35 Data-driven redrawing of the cortical map
1.36 -Raw dimensionality reduction We have applied the following dimensionality reduction algorithms to reduce the di-
1.37 -mensionality of the gene expression profile associated with each voxel: Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Simple
1.38 -PCA (SPCA), Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS), Isomap, Landmark Isomap, Laplacian eigenmaps, Local Tangent Space
1.39 -Alignment (LTSA), Hessian locally linear embedding, Diffusion maps, Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (SNE), Stochastic
1.40 -Proximity Embedding (SPE), Fast Maximum Variance Unfolding (FastMVU), Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NNMF).
1.41 -todo
1.42 -(might want to incld nnMF since mentioned above)
1.43 -Dimensionality reduction plus K-means or spectral clustering
1.44 +We have applied the following dimensionality reduction algorithms to reduce the dimensionality of the gene expression
1.45 +profile associated with each voxel: Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Simple PCA (SPCA), Multi-Dimensional Scaling
1.46 +(MDS), Isomap, Landmark Isomap, Laplacian eigenmaps, Local Tangent Space Alignment (LTSA), Hessian locally linear
1.47 +embedding, Diffusion maps, Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (SNE), Stochastic Proximity Embedding (SPE), Fast Maximum
1.48 +Variance Unfolding (FastMVU), Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NNMF). Space constraints prevent us from showing
1.49 +many of the results, but as a sample, PCA, NNMF, and landmark Isomap are shown in the second, third, and fourth rows
1.50 +of Figure 6.
1.51 +After applying the dimensionality reduction, we ran clustering algorithms on the reduced data. To date we have tried
1.52 +k-means and spectral clustering. The results of k-means after PCA, NNMF, and landmark Isomap are shown in the last
1.53 +row of Figure 6. To compare, the first row of Figure 6 shows some of the major subdivisions of cortex.
1.54 +todo: nnmf 7
1.55 Many areas are captured by clusters of genes
1.56 todo
1.57 todo